rynne: (stop the world)
I've only been on this job for four days, but last night's debate irritated me enough that I really did not want to go bug people about voting.

(Sigh. This is my conundrum with working for political campaigns. I would not like getting phone calls and visits from volunteers all the time--it feels like nagging, and I hate being nagged. But I want to get these people elected, and statistics say that this works. I hate doing it, but I want to be active. Bah.)

Of course, I did go tonight, since I'm not a volunteer; I'm going to get paid for this, and therefore need to show up.

But the thing is, we've got two 13-year-old volunteers. I think it's great--go them if they want to be active.

Apparently, however, people object to this. One of the kids was telling me today about how he got yelled at on the phone by this guy who thinks that people who aren't old enough to vote have no business working for political campaigns. And tonight another person called with the same issue and had to talk to a manager.

Oh my God, people, are you serious? You actually object to kids volunteering because they can't vote--even though volunteering is about the only thing they can do to affect an election? They have as much of a stake in any election as any other citizen, and here they are, trying to get their voices heard, and you think that because they can't vote, they can't do anything. I'd think people would be glad to see kids with a social conscience!

Jesus fucking Christ. My faith in humanity today is about nil.
rynne: (the background hum)
In dorm computer lab, but I think I might be driven away soon. Someone's alarm is going off, behind a locked door.

It did this yesterday, too. FOR HOURS. WTF is up with this person going away and leaving their bloody alarm to go off where everyone else on the floor (and the ones above and below, I imagine) has to listen to it? It's an alarm! These things are meant to be annoying, so that you will be willing to get up and make them stop as soon as possible!

Whoever lives in that room needs to COME BACK AND TURN OFF THE BLOODY ALARM.

Also, I want someone to help me figure out the ethernet thing. I want my computer back. I want to be able to access the internet and all my documents, and I want to be able to go on instant messengers without feeling guilty that I'm not doing schoolwork on a public computer. Also all the things I have bookmarked.

Gah. This is annoying.

/end whine

Also, there are exactly two weeks until my 21st birthday. This is a bit...o.O I'm still sort of incredulous that I'm in my twenties. Eep. XD

that vs who

Apr. 9th, 2006 01:07 am
rynne: (incapable of grammar)
I see this all the time and it's getting really annoying.

"Who" and "that" are both indicative pronouns. "Who" is used for people, and "that" is not.

STOP USING "THAT" WHEN YOU'RE DESCRIBING A PERSON. *stabbity*

And speaking of "who"...

"Whose" = possessive pronoun

"Who's" = contraction of "who is"

THEY ARE NOT INTERCHANGABLE.

"It's/its" is not the only case where the possessive pronoun doesn't have the apostrophe. Though so many people get that wrong, too... *grumblegrumble*

Alas for the rules of grammar, so often horribly abused...
rynne: (apostrophe)
I should either be in bed or finishing my essay, but instead I'm reading fanfic, and I keep coming across something that's getting really damn annoying.

In two days time.

In three weeks time.

In four months time.

Etc.

JEDSJKGAJGKADFKJAD;FJGAGERKLDAKJDFLGDFAG!!1!

I guess people don't get that those are short and non-awkward ways of saying something like "the time belonging to two days/three weeks/four months/etc."? 'Cause that's what they're supposed to be, and it should be "two days' time", "three weeks' time", "four months' time", and all that.

YOU NEED THE BLOODY APOSTROPHE.

It just makes no sense without the apostrophe. Without it, those time periods are pluralized, and it's just...what? What the hell does that mean? Maybe it's that it's 3:30 am right now, but I can't think of any meaning at all if there's no apostrophe when you're talking about something happening in two days' time. The time is being possessed by the time period (days/weeks/months/etc.), and therefore needs the apostrophe to indicate that possession.

Ragjkddjf.

Okay, done ranting. Back to your regularly scheduled...whatever it is that I usually post. :p

August 2013

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 9th, 2026 10:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios