(no subject)
Sep. 12th, 2007 04:35 pmSomething I've been thinking about, off and on, since I read DH, and I wanted to put down in words.
The prophecy had to have been about Harry--it wouldn't have worked with Neville. Not because of anything inherent in Harry or in Neville, but because of Lily and Alice. It took me a bit to really understand why Lily's sacrifice was enough to protect Harry, because surely she wasn't the only mother willing to die for her child, or just one person willing to die to protect another. The difference was that Voldemort gave her a choice, and that she chose to die for Harry rather than live and watch her son be killed is what gave her sacrifice power. But Voldemort only gave her that choice because Snape asked him to spare her. Somehow I doubt that Alice had any inner-circle Death Eaters so in love with her that they'd beg their merciless Dark Lord to spare her life.
So if Voldemort had chosen to go after the Longbottoms first, I bet he would have just killed Frank and Alice on his way to Neville as a matter of course, and then Neville would have died. Then he probably would have just proceeded on to Harry, and thanks to Lily, Harry would have still been the Boy-Who-Lived.
Ever since OotP came out, there's been a bunch of Neville-as-Boy-Who-Lived AU written, and I guess I find it interesting that it's even more AU than originally thought. Neville fit the paramaters of the prophecy, but it wouldn't really have worked for him, not unless Voldemort would have been willing to spare either Frank or Alice, which I don't think likely.
I think I need to find some more HP icons. Hmmm...
The prophecy had to have been about Harry--it wouldn't have worked with Neville. Not because of anything inherent in Harry or in Neville, but because of Lily and Alice. It took me a bit to really understand why Lily's sacrifice was enough to protect Harry, because surely she wasn't the only mother willing to die for her child, or just one person willing to die to protect another. The difference was that Voldemort gave her a choice, and that she chose to die for Harry rather than live and watch her son be killed is what gave her sacrifice power. But Voldemort only gave her that choice because Snape asked him to spare her. Somehow I doubt that Alice had any inner-circle Death Eaters so in love with her that they'd beg their merciless Dark Lord to spare her life.
So if Voldemort had chosen to go after the Longbottoms first, I bet he would have just killed Frank and Alice on his way to Neville as a matter of course, and then Neville would have died. Then he probably would have just proceeded on to Harry, and thanks to Lily, Harry would have still been the Boy-Who-Lived.
Ever since OotP came out, there's been a bunch of Neville-as-Boy-Who-Lived AU written, and I guess I find it interesting that it's even more AU than originally thought. Neville fit the paramaters of the prophecy, but it wouldn't really have worked for him, not unless Voldemort would have been willing to spare either Frank or Alice, which I don't think likely.
I think I need to find some more HP icons. Hmmm...
no subject
Date: 2007-09-13 12:19 am (UTC)I love Neville-as-Boy-Who-Lived scenarios, I just haven't found any well-written ones. :(
no subject
Date: 2007-09-13 12:44 am (UTC)I have no objection to Neville-as-Boy-Who-Lived stories, I just think they're more AU than previously supposed. :p I've found a few, but most of them seem to think Neville would have made a worse Boy-Who-Lived than Harry. *sigh* Never mind that in the first few books, all he lacked was confidence, and once he had that, he was awesome.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-13 02:27 am (UTC)I think it is interesting that Voldemort even bothered to give Lily the choice—I mean, was Snape so valuable an asset, or so close to V, that V considered honoring his wishes? He just doesn’t strike me as the kind of soulless dark wizard who would consider the feelings/whims of his subordinates.
Side note: If you are still looking for HP icons, I have a ton at my icon journal (
no subject
Date: 2007-09-13 07:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-13 07:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-13 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 11:02 am (UTC)